Naessens discovered a tiny particle in cells without which the cell cannot survive!
These subparticles, in the nanometer Naessens called “somatids”. He found that these extremely tiny particles can undergo morphologic changes, the entire range spanning 16 stages. The latter stages, from stage 4 to stage 16, are degenerative stages, whereas the first 3 are the normal, undistressed stages. Significantly, he showed too that the somatid's latter stages can be reversed by removing cell toxicity or by boosting the immune response.
The longer the cell remains toxic, the more likely the somatid's later stages will actualize. Relief of stress bring recovery to the cell as the degenerative stages go into reversal. From the 4th stage onward, the stages go from bad to worse. Or, disease can be vanquished in which case only the 1st 3 stages are to be seen.
The early degenerative stages resemble forms of virus. Further degeneration creates forms that resemble bacteria, and severe degeneration creates forms resembling fungi.
So when Dr. Bradstreet (probably assassinated by the FDA [and the list gets bigger]) said the autistic child has a multifocal viral infection, (detectable by measure of the enzyme nagalase in the blood), he was probably very accurate.
Naessens ingenious remedy was to flood the lymph with a nitrogenous natural compound that "liquified" the lymph and gave the immune system a boost to again take control of the body.
Jeff Bradstreet was able to cure many autistic children -- also by modulating an immune response. How did he revamp the immune system? He found that probiotics offered an easy and delicious way to recharge the body's immunological system. It happens that the immune system suffers shock, for whatever reason, and goes into a dormant state, but plenty of evidence now shows that that lethargy can be overturned. The new bacterial populations, it turns out, give us a natural means by which to vitalize the body’s defense mechanism, much like supplying a carpenter the hammer he needs to drive his nails.
Bradstreet and others found the cultures had been effective. They cured hundreds of children by providing this therapy in the clinic. It was working. All along the doctors thought their good results derived from a protein called “gcMaf”. Now newer research, as Dr. Marco Ruggiero of Italy has discovered, attributes an even smaller segment of that molecule as responsible for the positive spurring effect. In isolation of the rest, this tiny molecule provided the turnaround all by itself! That part of the previous molecule now did the trick on its own. He named his serum “Rerum”.
And much like Naessens had the ability to detect the rise or fall of disease, here too an enzyme has been found as the relevant marker.
The one point of contention that might arise between these two scientists, whether or not the viruses arrive into the milieu as invaders from the external environment, or whether they arise internally from the body’s own tissues.
What the Bradstreet doctors attribute to external viruses I believe are, in fact, virus-like forms produced from cellular somatids. The body, after all, came from the soil and will return to the soil (Gen. 3:19), so how will they “return”? Will they necessarily be gobbled up by scavengers from the outside, or, does the body itself “know” how to disintegrate itself? This harks back to the century-old controversy of Pasteur vs Beauchamp. Beauchamp's claim was that the terrain is the important health factor in disease; Pasteur believed the culprit was an outside invader on the attack. Beachamp's view has been the long-shot view now for over 100 years. I concur with Beachamp's thesis that it’s the terrain - not the agent - that mainly determines health or disease.
