Saturday, October 5, 2013

Mind a Knowledgeable Opinion on Vaccines

Found this:

I am in receipt of a letter concerning public action on vaccines.

The letter points out the manner in which unelected officials in government bureaucracies begin to rob the citizen of his fundamental rights and freedoms. It should be immediately recognized as such.

Those people attempting to force ANY type of compulsory or mandatory medical technique of ANY type other than quarantine for a short period of time [a necessity unlikely ever to occur] i.e., CDC, NIH, etc should be recognized as criminals and treated as such. They are violating the constitutionally guaranteed rights of citizens and are in violation of the principles laid down at Nuremberg over fifty years ago.

We must stop indulging in polite conversations with these people, they are NOT scientists, they are on the public dole and they are robbing us of our tax monies to support their nefarious roles in government, to wit, to support organized medicine and the pharmaceutical interests.

There is no such thing as a safe vaccine. The fact that this is so easily established from the historical record magnifies the terrible force with which we must reckon.

No vaccine ever prevented, ameliorated or cured any disease as the record, when properly interpreted or re-interpreted proves.

Every vaccine is a form of Russian Roulette and vaccination must be placed in the closet of medical quackery along with the rest of the drug driven nonsense of the 20th century.

Until reasonable men come to this conclusion the vaccine makers and drug makers will continue to hold sway.

They are NOT scientists, they are QUACKS. The real problem is that when someone, such as I, stands up and identifies them as such, I [WE] are considered the quacks. That exemplifies how far down the road we are and how difficult it is going to be finally extricate them.

You must ask yourself, wherein lies the quackery of the ESTABLISHMENT today? Keeping in mind that EVERY age has its own peculiar form of ESTABLISHMENT quackery and that this age is NO exception to THAT rule.

I have studied the vaccine situation since first vaccinated at my induction into the military in 1947. I spent the next 21 years avoiding my next vaccination and I very carefully investigated the effects of vaccination. I can tell you that it is the worst horror story imaginable and none, not even the anti-vaccinationists have the slightest clue as to exactly how horrible that story is.

Daniel H Duffy Sr DC
Small town family doctor, 30 years.
Retired Air Force Officer 21 years.

======== Establishment Vaccine Propaganda =============

Elsewhere, Dr. Daniel H. Duffy, Sr., from Geneva, Ohio, wrote:

I have been a small town family doctor for over thirty years. Prior to that, for about quarter century, I traveled the world over while always avoiding any type of vaccination. Unlike the author, I read the real history of vaccination as well as the establishment propaganda version. I began to do that after being vaccinated upon entry into military service and suffering terribly from that series of several shots that recruits received all at once. My subsequent investigation revealed that the meningitis suffered mainly on military installations back in the '40s and 50s was suffered only by freshly vaccinated recruits and never by the mess sargeant, the drill sargeant, the Captain or the little girls in the service club with whom we played kissy face - only the freshly vaccinated recruits "caught" the meningitis - that aroused in me a great curiosity - it made of me, an observer and an investigator - I've been watching the vaccination scene ever since [1947]. Your article stated: "The activities of today's propagandists against immunisations are directly descended from, indeed little changed from, those of the anti- vaccinationists of the late nineteenth century"

History demonstrates that, in fact, the propaganda stems from your side of the debate rather than from that of the antivaccinationists. Has Robert never investigated the history of vaccines? All of the major "epidemic" diseases were just about on their way out long before any serious vaccinations took place and even then the percentages of those vaccinated were miniscule. Allow me to let you in on just a few of the hundreds of historical facts that the parrot of the establishment viewpoint will never run across: 1. During the early polio epidemics, just before the first vaccine was used, doctors were ordered not to report polio cases until thirty days after symptom onset. Guess what that did to the numbers? 2. At about the same time, Benjamin Sandler MD demonstrated conclusively that diets high in the sugar foods commonly consumed in the post war boom actually predisposed to polio especially during the summer months. Authorities in his small town shut down the sale of junk foods and the polio rate immediately dropped to zero in his town. 3. Sandler published his no sugar, essentially high protein, low carbohydrate diet in every major newspaper in the country - did anyone ever factor that effect into the equation along with the alleged effect of the vaccines? 4. Sandler then demonstrated that only by dumping the blood sugar of lab animals via the use of insulin could he prompt them to demonstrate polio- like symptoms. A small book was published on his studies. 5. Did you know that there are about 2000 names for polio in the medical language? 6. Did you know that the favorite name for polio is now aseptic meningitis? Did you know that the name was changed back in the good old days as another ruse to make it look like vaccines were reducing polio? 7. Did you know that VIOXX causes polio? That is if you want to call it by its old name. The PDR lists it as aseptic meningitis. My guess is that the one or two school kids recently diagnosed with meningitis here in Ohio were never checked for drug effects. For the reader's information, all of the old "epidemics" were caused by malthusian-predicted societal outgrowths of food supplies with its subsequent malnutrition. The rats and fleas and bugs are still with us but the "epidemics" are all gone. Robert has been hoodwinked by the germ theory of disease [upon which a criminal industry depends] he joins the ranks of other historical victims of authoritarian propaganda based upon belief systems such as Ptolemy's flat-earth-centered universe. The germ theory of disease is such an incredibly stupid notion! It's like saying that flies cause manure piles and firemen cause fires. Doesn't anyone ever wonder why the doctors never "catch" all this stuff? In over thirty years of clinical practice I have never seen an infectious hepatitis "caught" by another member of a household and believe me when I say I really looked high and low for one of those. If I found one I would look for a source of the poisoning, not for a germ or a virus. The authors are victims of the germ theory propaganda that has about 85% of the world's "educated" population under its control.

Saturday, July 27, 2013

Why I Boycott Pepsi

PepsiCo to no longer call Naked juices 'natural' following lawsuit

Associated Press
By Candice Choi

PepsiCo Inc. said it will no longer label its Naked juices as being "all natural," after a lawsuit complained that the drinks contain ingredients that don't fit that bill.

The company, based in Purchase, N.Y., also agreed to pay $9 million to settle the lawsuit.

In an emailed statement, the company said it uses an "added boost of vitamins" in some of the drinks. But a lawsuit filed against the company noted that the vitamins are actually synthetic ingredients, including a fiber made by Archer Daniels Midland.

PepsiCo did not respond when asked whether those synthetic fibers are in fact included in the juices. The company's statement said it will drop the use of the word "natural" until there is more regulatory guidance around the world.

A hearing for the settlement is scheduled for Monday and has not yet been approved by a judge, noted Shirish Gupta, an attorney who's representing a plaintiff in one of the lawsuits filed against PepsiCo's Naked juices.

Gupta noted that the settlement was reached by a different attorney who was negotiating on behalf of several similar cases. Gupta's firm plans to oppose the settlement, in part because he feels the method of notifying affected customers wouldn't reach a broad enough audience.

The case highlights the confusion around the use of the word "natural" in in the industry. The Food and Drug Administration doesn't currently have a definition for what constitutes a natural product. But it says that it doesn't object to the term's use if the food doesn't have "added color, artificial flavors or synthetic substances."

Notably, the FDA said it's difficult to define a food product that is natural, since it has likely been processed and is no longer a "product of the earth."

Michele Simon, a public health lawyer and critic of food industry marketing practices, noted that there are numerous cases making their way through the legal system because of food companies' use of the word "natural." She said the PepsiCo case was notable because the company was in essence addressing the murkiness of the word with the settlement.

"This company is basically surrendering the use of the offensive, deceptive marketing term," Simon said.

One of the lawsuits against PepsiCo noted that the company cultivates a "healthy and socially conscious image" to boost sales of the drinks, which typically cost around $4 a bottle. It noted that PepsiCo knew its target market would be willing to pay more for natural drinks that are 100 percent juice and free of genetically modified organisms.

The lawsuit also claimed that PepsiCo used genetically modified organisms in its Naked juices. In its statement, the company denied that claim and said its drinks will continue to be labeled "non-GMO." It said it plans to enlist a third-party to confirm the non-GMO status of the juices.

PepsiCo did not say when it planned to make the labeling changes in line with the settlement, reached earlier this month. On Friday, the website for Naked Juices still showed bottles with the words "all natural" on them.

But if truth be told -- Coke tastes so much better anyhow!

Monday, May 20, 2013

The Symptom of Cancer

Most people when they hear news of the dreaded SYMPTOM called "cancer" run straight away into the waiting hands of the conventional ("allopathic") doctor, whose only means of "treatment" - not cure - is to attack the symptom, because he was taught, since medical school, that this symptom IS the disease. It never occurs to this blind-sighted doctor that this symptom is NOT the disease, which is why he leaves the cause of the disease undisturbed. This is why the symptom almost always returns and finally kills the patient. No matter what "greatest doctor" they turn to, or what "great oncological facility" they go to, the results are usually the same. And when he loses the patient, the doctor thinks he tried his best, because anyways against this "disease" there isn't anything else he can do more.

It's not just the doctor who knows no better. The patients, the population at large - know no better. Which is why they run to these medical practitioners and facilities in the first place.

Actually it should be the very LAST place to go for someone with the symptom of cancer.

Unfortunately this incorrect mode of thought runs deeply ingrained in most people. Most remain ignorant of the real truth because the medical establishment continues to push this fallacy - purposely - to push their hidden agenda, namely, of making money by pushing drugs, surgery and radiation. These 3 modes of "treatment", plus the fact that hospital beds can thus be occupied, make for a great system of squeezing the last dollar out of the sick, dying person.

Any method that comes along that can claim better results, especially if it promises to be a cheaper way to go, if not more humane and much more effective, will be branded taboo and the forces of this mafia will come down hard on he who dares buck the system.

Do you ever hear the advertisements for these oncology facilities? "Oh, our facility is kinder and gentler to the 'victim', and we know so much about how to do it, and we've been at this for so much longer that we've perfected it, and we have instruments of precision better than any other facility, yak yak yak ...." It's outright shameful! They commit this disaster upon elders and children alike.

Chemotherapy is the delivery of poisons into the body, as if there weren't enough of that already. It's what caused cancer in the first place. Radiation burns the body. Surgery mutilates it. At best the symptom passes away for a short time, but because the underlying cause hasn't been dealt with, it is bound to return. Plus there is also the not insignificant aspect of secondary side-effects of these methods which make the poor patient feel all that much worse in his final days.

That these methods ultimately end up killing patients also serves the industry very well. They can then therefore attach dread, fear and "poor prognosis" to this so-called "disease". They can also therefore make the patient feel he must act quickly, without much thought, as if time is the most urgent matter to consider. The time between diagnosis of the dreaded "disease" and the application of a "treatment protocol" is a very short period, therefore, which, of course, plays right into the hands of this evil quackery.

Little to people realize the cancer symptom is nothing more than many years of poor nutrition or accumulative toxicity, and because they do NOT know this, they also do not know that there is a CURE, and nothing less than a full cure, if only they knew where to look.

Here's an example of someone who knew better!

Wikipedia & Medicine - Very Unreliable

Forget Wikipedia for your medical knowledge. Anything worthy of your knowledge the mafia will label quackery; Big-Pharma sends out its paid coolies to write stuff in their own favor. Here, for example, is the experience of Dr. Max Gerson's grandson, who posted on Wikipedia - for the benefit of people - and the result was, a document for the benefit of Big-Pharma:

August 9th,
By: Andrew W. Saul, Ph.D.

There is nothing quite like a paper trail, and Wikipedia has one. Consequently, you can read for yourself all the material that has been added, and then deleted.

For example: Wikipedia’s page about Max Gerson, M.D., is . The doctor is widely known for the nutritional cancer therapy that bears his name. Gerson’s principal biographer is his grandson, Howard Straus. Mr. Straus tells the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service of some interesting experiences he has had with Wikipedia bias:

“Some years ago, on seeing that the pages for Dr. Max Gerson and the Gerson Therapy were only stubs (short place-holders with little information on them), I took it upon myself to flesh out the pages. I thought Wikipedia was fairly neutral on balance, so I put in all the information that I could, and kept it factual with references, citations, and literature links.

“Within a month, the following had happened:

“The information was labeled as “biased” and “unreliable” because I am Dr. Gerson’s grandson and biographer. There appeared a big red flag at the top of the article labeling the articles neutrality “dubious.” The photograph I posted was removed. Provable, referenced facts, with dates and places, all suddenly became “claims,” even quotes from no less than Nobel Laureate Albert Schweitzer, M.D., who famously said: “I see in Dr. Max Gerson one of the most eminent geniuses in medical history.” Dr. Schweitzer and his wife were patients of Dr. Gerson, making this a first-hand account from a rather reliable source.

“All my links, references and citations were removed. They were replaced by links to the American Cancer Society and National Cancer Institute, which offer only criticism of the Gerson Therapy. Even quotations from published scientific papers were removed. Attempts to rectify these actions were immediately overwritten.

“It’s easy enough to show the progression of the pages, since Wikipedia displays former edits on request, dated and documented. One can verify this by clicking on the “History” tab at the top of the Max Gerson page, and looking at 2005 and before. My editing is archived at and also

“A second Wikipedia page, specific to the Gerson Therapy, has been completely removed. . To see something of what happened, you can click the “History” tab here as well.”

The OMNS adds just one other intriguing statement about Dr. Gerson’s work that is probably too “unreliable” to be seen on Wikipedia:

“I know of one patient who turned to Gerson Therapy having been told she was suffering from terminal cancer and would not survive another course of chemotherapy. Happily, seven years later, she is alive and well. So it is vital that, rather than dismissing such experiences, we should further investigate the beneficial nature of these treatments.” (H.R.H. Charles, Prince of Wales)

Max Gerson is not the only nutritionally-oriented physician whose work is slanted or censored at Wikipedia. Others include Matthias Rath, M.D., and Robert F. Cathcart III, M.D.

Matthias Rath, M.D.

Dr. Rath coauthored a number of papers with Linus Pauling. (1-8) They discussed high-dose vitamin therapy for cardiovascular disease. To see what is going on at Wikipedia concerning him:

Paul Anthony Taylor, a supporter of Dr. Rath, comments: “Instead of providing free access to the sum of all human knowledge, as is its supposed aim, Wikipedia would appear to be just another way of supporting the scientific, political and social status quo. In a sense, however, the game is already up for Wikipedia. The official exams watchdog in the UK, Ofqual, recently stated that schoolchildren should avoid it as it is not “authoritative or accurate” and in some cases “may be completely untrue” Believe it or not, one of Wikipedia’s contributors is the CIA, and they are not just updating their own entries, either. When it comes to nutritional therapies, you won’t currently find much of it on Wikipedia.”

Robert F. Cathcart, M.D.

The Wikipedia page for this physician has been deleted. Why? Because Dr. Cathcart “does not meet notability criteria per WP:BIO ” and “a quick google search shows up no reliable hits for this subject.”

Indeed? It appears that someone was not looking. Orthopedic surgeon Robert F. Cathcart III is the inventor of the Cathcart Elliptical Orthocentric Endoprosthesis, a replacement hip-ball joint still in widespread use today after 37 years. Some physicians report it to be superior to other similar devices. That alone qualifies him as notable, and invalidates the deletion of his page at Wikipedia. In addition, Linus Pauling personally singled out Dr. Cathcart for recognition for his nutritional knowledge as early as 1978. (9)

Possibly, just possibly, the real reason Dr. Cathcart is deleted from Wikipedia has much more to do with his outspoken advocacy of very high doses of vitamin C to treat viral illnesses. and either or

Here is all the deleted material on Dr. Cathcart:

Take a look and decide for yourself.

(Full article here: