Thursday, December 16, 2010

Thousands of Babies Dying From Vaccine

For many years governments and medical professionals around the world have been fully aware that babies can and do die from adverse reactions to vaccination. Many government and medical websites however, forcefully repeat that there is no clear factual evidence of the causal link with vaccines and sudden infant death syndrome or SIDS. This is totally incorrect and misleading. The numbers of such vaccines deaths have never been truthfully reported, despite freely available published information. Valdes-Dapena (1967). Sudden and unexpected deaths in infancy: a review of the world literature 1954-1966) wrote:

"Sudden and unexpected death in infancy, in the United States alone, accounts for the loss of 15,000 to 25,000 human lives annually".
Read the article here.

Sunday, November 28, 2010

A Case of Leukemia - Cured

Here's an interesting case of leukemia cured. What I like most about the case is that it confirms, for the umpteenth time, that "conventional" therapy DOES NOT WORK, although they keep trying it decades after decades, while better methodologies exist and abound. (Only a change to a good diet will usually work. )
Amazing first: leukemia patient completely cured with cord blood stem cells
BERLIN - Doctors associated with the German umbilical cord blood bank Vita 34 say that they have cured a child’s leukemia completely using an infusion of stem cells from umbilical cord blood.

The procedure was reportedly performed in 2005 on a four-year-old girl whose chemotherapy treatment had failed and who had a prognosis of only three months to live. The procedure was possible because the parents had decided to preserve their child’s umbilical cord blood at the time of birth.

After continuous monitoring of the child for five years now, with no sign of leukemia cells in her blood, doctors say that they have confirmed that the treatment worked.

“Seventy-five months have passed and we can speak of a cure with certainty,” said Eberhard Lampeter of Vita 34.

According to the Chilean newspaper La Tercera, this is the first case in the world of a child cured of leukemia by her own stem cells. In most cases the child’s umbilical cord blood is not available, and the stem cells of close family members must be used.

The new treatment is the latest in a long string of hundreds of successes in the science of stem cell treatments that use mature cells rather than embryonic stem cells. Embryonic stem cell treatments, which destroy a human life, have never been proven effective in any medical treatment to date. Treatments with mature stem cells do not cause harm to the donor of the cells.

Stem cell pioneer Dr. Colin McGuckin recently told LifeSiteNews that, despite amazing success with umbilical cord blood treatments, it remains difficult to obtain funding for research because of the “cult of celebrity” in science, which rewards controversial research over research that is truly effective in saving lives.

“People aren’t talking about cord blood because it’s not controversial,” McGuckin told LSN. “Consequently, it does not make headlines and therefore researchers who want to use the cells from cord blood do not receive funding.”

Energy-Saving Bulbs - Be Very Careful ...

According to data from the web, so-called "Energy-Saving" bulbs, or low energy bulbs, if broken, can cause serious danger! If broken in a person'e presence, the person should leave the room for at least 15 minutes. The gas liberated from this item on breakage is mercury vapor, which is a very strong poison that should not be inhaled. Some Ministry in England warns NOT to clean up the debris with a vacuum cleaner, because it would spread the contamination to other rooms in the house when using the vacuum cleaner again. Don't forget the gas doesn't stay with physical dirt but can easily dissipate into the air. Rather, the broken glass and debris should be swept with a broom or brush, sealed and thrown right away from the house into a bin for hazardous materials. Mercury is dangerous, more poisonous than lead or arsenic!

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

The Medical Mafia in Distortional, Destructive Mode

You've heard of Dr. Max Gerson, have you not? He devised, first a cure for tuberculosis, until then an "incurable" disease, and later a cure for cancer. (The person who identified the tuberculosis bacterium got the Nobel Prize; The one who found its cure - did not.) He cured Albert Schweitzer, M.D., this man's wife and daughter, of ailments and received public accolades from this Nobel Laureate. He presented before Congress and spoke of his many cured "incurable" cancer patients on broadcast radio. He wrote a book of 50 such "incurable" patients, who were sent home to die by "conventional" doctors, this after they raided and ransacked his property and stole his previously recorded manuscript of this book.

Had you heard of Dr. Matthias Rath? He co-authored a number of papers with Linus Pauling, a Nobel Laureate in medicine, about the effects of Vitamin C on cancer. Heard about Dr. Robert F. Cathcart III, the orthopedic surgeon who invented the replacement hip-ball joint still in use today? He too was strobg advocate of heavy Vitamin C use in disease.

Now check out what the Medical Mafia has done to the Wiki documentation that originally existed on the internet, before this rotten group of controllers stuck their greedy fingers into the information base - to hide this stuff FROM YOU! (Because reading this information could only empower you and they would stand to lose multi billions of dollars that come out of YOUR POCKET for the "conventional treatments", because this information reveals the efficacy of therapies that CANNOT BE PATENTED!
The Hidden Wikipedia:
How to Find Deleted Material about Nutritional Medicine
(OMNS, May 11, 2010) There is nothing quite like a paper trail, and Wikipedia has one. Consequently, you can read for yourself all the material that has been added, and then deleted.

For example: Wikipedia’s page about
Max Gerson, M.D., is . The doctor is widely known for the nutritional cancer therapy that bears his name. Gerson’s principal biographer is his grandson, Howard Straus . Mr. Straus tells the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service of some interesting experiences he has had with Wikipedia bias:

“Some years ago, on seeing that the pages for Dr. Max Gerson and the Gerson Therapy were only stubs (short place-holders with little information on them), I took it upon myself to flesh out the pages. I thought Wikipedia was fairly neutral on balance, so I put in all the information that I could, and kept it factual with references, citations, and literature links.

“Within a month, the following had happened:

“The information was labeled as “biased” and “unreliable” because I am Dr. Gerson’s grandson and biographer. There appeared a big red flag at the top of the article labeling the articles neutrality “dubious.” The photograph I posted was removed. Provable, referenced facts, with dates and places, all suddenly became “claims,” even quotes from no less than Nobel Laureate Albert Schweitzer, M.D., who famously said: “I see in Dr. Max Gerson one of the most eminent geniuses in medical history.” Dr. Schweitzer and his wife were patients of Dr. Gerson, making this a first-hand account from a rather reliable source.

“All my links, references and citations were removed. They were replaced by links to the American Cancer Society and National Cancer Institute, which offer only criticism of the Gerson Therapy. Even quotations from published scientific papers were removed. Attempts to rectify these actions were immediately overwritten.

“It’s easy enough to show the progression of the pages, since Wikipedia displays former edits on request, dated and documented. One can verify this by clicking on the “History” tab at the top of the Max Gerson page, and looking at 2005 and before. My editing is archived at and also

“A second Wikipedia page, specific to the Gerson Therapy, has been completely removed. . To see something of what happened, you can click the “History” tab here as well.”

The OMNS adds just one other intriguing statement about Dr. Gerson’s work that is probably too “unreliable” to be seen on Wikipedia:

“I know of one patient who turned to Gerson Therapy having been told she was suffering from terminal cancer and would not survive another course of chemotherapy. Happily, seven years later, she is alive and well. So it is vital that, rather than dismissing such experiences, we should further investigate the beneficial nature of these treatments.” (H.R.H. Charles, Prince of Wales)

Max Gerson is not the only nutritionally-oriented physician whose work is slanted or censored at Wikipedia. Others include Matthias Rath, M.D., and Robert F. Cathcart III, M.D.

Matthias Rath, M.D.
Dr. Rath coauthored a number of papers with Linus Pauling. (1- They discussed high-dose vitamin therapy for cardiovascular disease. To see what is going on at Wikipedia concerning him:
Paul Anthony Taylor, a supporter of Dr. Rath, comments: “Instead of providing free access to the sum of all human knowledge, as is its supposed aim, Wikipedia would appear to be just another way of supporting the scientific, political and social status quo. In a sense, however, the game is already up for Wikipedia.

The official exams watchdog in the UK, Ofqual, recently stated that schoolchildren should avoid it as it is not “authoritative or accurate” and in some cases “may be completely untrue” Believe it or not, one of Wikipedia’s contributors is the CIA, and they are not just updating their own entries, either. When it comes to nutritional therapies, you won’t currently find much of it on Wikipedia.”

Robert F. Cathcart, M.D.
The Wikipedia page for this physician has been deleted.
Why? Because Dr. Cathcart “does not meet notability criteria per WP:BIO ” and “a quick google search shows up no reliable hits for this subject.”

Indeed? It appears that someone was not looking. Orthopedic surgeon Robert F. Cathcart III is the inventor of the Cathcart Elliptical Orthocentric Endoprosthesis, a replacement hip-ball joint still in widespread use today after 37 years. Some physicians report it to be superior to other similar devices. That alone qualifies him as notable, and invalidates the deletion of his page at Wikipedia. In addition, Linus Pauling personally singled out Dr. Cathcart for recognition for his nutritional knowledge as early as 1978. (9)
You can read the rest here.

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

A Brief Documentary of "Conventional" vs "Alternative" Therapy

A historic documentary of how the mafia-like medical establishment gained its death-grip; Of how hundreds of promising cancer cures are crushed and suppressed - rigging each case to guarantee its failure.

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

C A N C E R -- Is Curable!

Here's an article by a doctor who courageously tells the truth about this dreaded disease - dreaded only because the medical mafia establishment prevents any good research be done to alleviate this disease, because that would eliminate the tremendous profit to be had in cutting, burning and poisoning - the standard protocol that for over half a century has made them trillions. Yet there exist so many natural, alternative medical approaches, each able to tackle this disease better than the "conventional" one. Here is another example of one such new avenue that promises to deliver a much better prognosis, at a much cheaper cost, without destructive side effects. By the way, Dr. Simoncini, of whom this article talks about, has appeared on this site before, as has its author, Dr. Rowen.

Quickest, Easiest, Cheapest Cancer Treatment Ever Bicarbonate

by Dr. Robert Rowen

This May Be the Quickest, Easiest, Cheapest, and Most Effective Cancer Treatment Ever!

I’ve treated many cases of cancer going against the standard slash, burn, and cut mantra of the medical establishment.

And I’ve seen some great success. But no injection therapy I’ve ever used took my breath away for its ease of use and effectiveness. That is until I saw the treatment I’m going to tell you about this month!

In fact, this remedy is so inexpensive that you probably have some sitting in your refrigerator right now. You’ve probably baked with it. The raw material costs mere pennies. It’s exceedingly safe. Its beauty lies in its simplicity. And it may be the greatest discovery for cancer treatment, EVER.

This astounding cancer treatment is nothing more than sodium bicarbonate. You know it as baking soda. And I am excited to be the first to bring you news of this stunning breakthrough.

I know it sounds unbelievable. I’m sure you’re sitting there saying, Baking soda cures cancer? Dr. Rowen’s lost his mind.

Well, give me a chance to turn you into a believer.

Dr. Tullio Simoncini is an Italian physician who was the first to discover bicarbonate’s ability to cure cancer. I recently met Dr. Simoncini at a seminar in Florida. I was so impressed that when I heard he was coming back to teach in Dallas, I had to see him again.

However, before you can understand Dr. Simoncini’s work, you need a little background. Dr. Simoncini’s work is based on the groundbreaking work of several pioneers in alternative medicine. Back in the 1930s, for instance, Weston Price, DDS traveled the world studying health and nutrition in various people groups.

Dr. Price studied dwindling aboriginal cultures as they still existed at the time. He detailed their amazing health and why they were far healthier than people in our own culture. Price found tribes where reaching 100 was commonplace.

Men were still tending their fields and chasing women decades younger. Physical degeneration was rare. There were few if any dental cavities or decay. Dental arches were nearly perfect, no need for orthodonture.

People were healthy right up until the time of their death. Then they would fall asleep and simply not wake up. What a great way to go. Our big killers, cancer and heart disease were largely unknown.

The common link among all the indigenous people was their diet.

The various peoples were not eating the same foods. They couldn’t, separated by vast differences in climates, altitudes, etc. Some had lots of meat, some had almost none. But there was a commonality.

The soils of their fields were rich in minerals, often from glacial silt runoff. The plants likewise were loaded with minerals. The peoples ate what grew around them, when in season, organic and fresh.

Price returned to some of these cultures years later. Indeed the physical health had deteriorated in many. Children had rotting teeth, their arches became malformed with crowding teeth.

The formerly robust physical bodies of adults were now riddled with the same degenerative diseases we experience. Price observed the clear reason they were now eating processed foods from the West.

What happened to our food that so destroyed our bodies? In the 1930s and 40s government actions paved the way for big business agriculture. In the 40s the government started analyzing our crops and soils for minerals.

In the ensuing 70 years or so, as Agribusiness took over, the mineral content of our soil has plummeted over 80%. This plunge is reflected in known mineral content of our foods, both organic and non-organic. Our produce is woefully lacking in the minerals once rich in our diet and necessary for health.

Let me give you an example of how this shift in our soil’s mineral content significantly affects our health. Back in the 1940s, a medical pioneer, Max Gerson, MD was curing cancer.

His cure? Diet, and diet alone. He used fresh living foods and juices, organic and fresh. His cure rate was about 30-35%, light years better than any conventional method of today.

Strangely, those of us following him have not been able to reproduce his success. That confused many of my colleagues into wondering about Gerson altogether. Well, there’s a simple explanation. It all revolves around acid-base and minerals.

Minerals in solution are positively charged. In fact, all minerals in our cells are positively charged. But what happens when we don’t have enough minerals?

Dr. John Apsley, executive director of the Immunogenic Research Foundation, Inc., has the answer. His answer also explains why Gerson’s therapy doesn’t work nearly as well anymore.

Dr. Apsley said, We are living in different nutritional times. We now are so depleted in cations (positively charged minerals) that our cells, desperate to stay alive, will grab onto anything positively charged.

With no or few minerals, the only thing they can resort to is positively charged hydrogen ions (which are nothing more than acid ions) or positively charged chemical toxins.

Gerson Therapy worked because his patients were not nearly as far-gone nutritionally as we are. A fruit and vegetable-rich diet was able to replace needed cation minerals successfully in a third of his patients.

Apsley said that a light went on in his brain when learning of Dr. Simoncini’s successes. He said that injecting bicarbonate into the cancer site does something that diet alone can’t do.

The bicarbonate literally sucks out the acid hydrogen ions, from the deepest regions of your cells. This allows nutritional minerals to replace the semi-toxic acid. This recharges your cellular defenses.

The patients of Gerson’s day ate foods that were far richer in minerals in those years. Gerson’s juicing program gave the cancer patients high concentrations of the most absorbable form of minerals fresh juice. Minerals were in their natural plant-made colloid state, as prepared for us by God. Gerson’s patients were not nearly so mineral depleted as we are now.

They also were not as acid. So, he could cure many cancer patients with diet alone.

Baking soda is alkaline. It is also negatively charged. So it helps reduce your acid state. But it does a lot more than that.

Dr. Simoncini discovered research showing that all solid cancers have something in common. They are all held together by a fungus. This fungus produces an acid-based glue that holds it and the cancer cells together.

This fungus is none other than Candida, the common fungus in many yeast infections. Dr. Simoncini found out that Candida plays a vital role in cancer’s ability to survive. Here’s why.

All normal cells are programmed to self-destruct after a period of time, or if they are damaged. That process is called apoptosis. Normal apoptosis is the main way your body wards off cancer.

But, Candida makes toxins that directly impair the apoptosis process. If your cell doesn’t self-destruct when it goes awry, it can further degenerate into endless division. At that point, it becomes cancerous.

Dr. Simoncini maintains that Candida becomes intertwined with tumors, protecting its immortality. To destroy the tumor, we have to knock out this fungus. So you might think that antifungal drugs might do it. They don’t. No one has ever cured cancer with an antifungal drug.

But baking soda does!

We’ve known for years that sodium bicarbonate kills all sorts of fungi and microorganisms. It works so well, in fact, that there are patents in Europe and the U.S. for its use against these invaders. (You can check this out for yourself by searching for patent number 6432425 at the website or patent number EP1233374 at the website

So how does Dr. Simoncini knock out cancer with sodium bicarbonate? He administers 500 cc of a 5% bicarbonate solution intravenously over about one hour, many doctors add potassium to their IV solution.

And he does so six days out of seven. He may also inject it at the site of a local tumor for accessible cancers (like breast). With a cooperating invasive radiologist, he may have a catheter inserted directly into the artery feeding the cancer. He’ll then pump in the bicarbonate directly.

Remember, bicarbonate is alkaline and negatively charged. It neutralizes the positively charged acid glue that holds Candida together. With the bicarbonate, the fungus just falls apart. Without the fungus to maintain it, the cancers immediately self-destruct.

Now Dr. Simoncini admits there is a weakness. You need a good blood supply to bring ample bicarbonate to the tumor. Soft tissue primary cancers and metastases usually have enough blood supply. However, metastases to bone may not.

Many of Dr. Simoncini’s supportive colleagues have modified his protocol to include alternating weeks of bicarbonate with high dose intravenous vitamin C (100 grams in 1,000 cc D5W) over five hours.

They do this daily, except one day off per week. The two weeks (one of bicarbonate and one of vitamin C) completes one cycle. It will often take only three more cycles to get rid of almost all soft tissue cancers!

I will admit that, at first blush, this seemed too simplistic. This is a disease that has a trillion-dollar industry built around it. Five-and-dime baking soda? Vitamin C? I thought, No way!

But look at how effective the Simoncini protocol is. The overwhelming majority of primary and non-osseous (non-bone) metastatic cancers disappear within days to weeks. Days? Yes indeed.

When it comes to breast cancer, your doctor can flood local tumors with bicarbonate. Local injection can be very painful to be sure. But wouldn’t you rather take some pain and spare your breast from getting chopped off by a surgeon?

Dr. Simoncini’s breast protocol calls for surrounding a breast tumor with up to 120 cc of 5% sodium bicarbonate solution daily if tolerated. After several sessions, most of these local cancers are totally gone!

Distant cancers require intravenous bicarbonate. Even better is direct infusion into the artery feeding the tumor. In Italy, Dr. Simoncini has the luxury of open-minded interventional radiologists.

Many of them are willing to place catheters into the target arteries for direct bicarbonate infusion into the tumor. This is not possible in our current medical system. So far, none of the bicarbonate trainees have been able to find a caring radiologist who’ll place the patient above dogma.

But some doctors are willing to place the catheters for IV vitamin C. That means there’s hope that you can get this done.

This happened to Sarah Jones. She and her husband, Bob Jones, sponsored Simoncini’s visits to the U.S. She was dying of metastatic breast cancer. She had failed all therapies. With intravenous bicarbonate, she cleared all her soft tissue metastases.

Only bone cancers were left. She started vitamin C drips. The bone metastases did regress. She came off morphine in four days. But she had received radiation 6 months previously.

It led to terminal complications and she did succumb. Bob tells me that he is following at least 40 other patients of which only 4 have not done well (arresting the cancer or better).

Folks, this is a miraculous story! I will update you regularly with the latest information on the five and dime treatment of cancer. No, it doesn’t really cost a nickel. We have to use extremely pure pharmaceutical preparations unlike what’s in your refrigerator.

But the basic stuff is the same: simple baking soda! Injection preps aren’t cheap either. But when compared to Big Pharma’s bazillion buck poisonous treatments, the treatment is very inexpensive.

I am again thrilled to get you this potentially lifesaving information. It’s so simple that any qualified provider who is trained in IV techniques can administer it in your own home. It’s ease of use and low cost will make this treatment a major target of federal bureaucratic agencies.

If and when you see any negative information about bicarbonate therapy, please be sure to note who is pushing it. A bicarbonate cure for cancer could upend one of the richest, most evil and gruesome industries in the world: the cancer establishment.

For more information on Dr. Simoncini’s incredible work, read his book Cancer Is a Fungus. It’s available at And for more information on Dr. Price’s timeless work, visit the Price Pottenger Foundation’s website at
Original article here.

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

Your Government Hard at Work - Destroying Our Freedom to Have Good Food

Read and watch the video in the link below and learn, if you don't yet know, how the U.S. Government is intent on discouraging private food distribution arrangements, among other things. See how they want to take away our inalienable rights to eat NATURAL FOODS! Read about the notorious Rawsome Raid in California. See how menacing government can really be.

Here's the article.

Friday, October 15, 2010

Cancer is Man-Made

The significance of this article will be lost on most practitioners or proponents of conventional medicine. That's because they never delve into the "why" of cancer, i.e., it's etiology. They're just concerned about attacking its symptoms; They make money from the trio: surgery, radiation and chemotherapy, and let all else be damned; Who cares what causes cancer!
Cancer 'is purely man-made' say scientists after finding almost no trace of disease in Egyptian mummies
15th October 2010

Cancer is a man-made disease fuelled by the excesses of modern life, a study of ancient remains has found.

Tumours were rare until recent times when pollution and poor diet became issues, the review of mummies, fossils and classical literature found.

A greater understanding of its origins could lead to treatments for the disease, which claims more than 150,000 lives a year in the UK.
Scientists found no signs of cancer in their extensive study of mummies apart from one isolated case

Michael Zimmerman, a visiting professor at Manchester University, said: 'In an ancient society lacking surgical intervention, evidence of cancer should remain in all cases.

'The virtual absence of malignancies in mummies must be interpreted as indicating their rarity in antiquity, indicating that cancer-causing factors are limited to societies affected by modern industrialisation.'

To trace cancer's roots, Professor Zimmerman and colleague Rosalie David analysed possible references to the disease in classical literature and scrutinised signs in the fossil record and in mummified bodies.

Despite slivers of tissue from hundreds of Egyptian mummies being rehydrated and placed under the microscope, only one case of cancer has been confirmed.

This is despite experiments showing that tumours should be even better preserved by mummification than healthy tissues.

Dismissing the argument that the ancient Egyptians didn't live long enough to develop cancer, the researchers pointed out that other age-related disease such as hardening of the arteries and brittle bones died occur.

Fossil evidence of cancer is also sparse, with scientific literature providing a few dozen, mostly disputed, examples in animal fossil, the journal Nature Reviews Cancer reports.

Even the study of thousands of Neanderthal bones has provided only one example of a possible cancer.
Caricaturist James Gillray illustrated the taking of snuff, which appears in first reports in scientific literature of distinctive tumours of nasal cancer in snuff users in 1761

Evidence of cancer in ancient Egyptian texts is also 'tenuous' with cancer-like problems more likely to have been caused by leprosy or even varicose veins.

The ancient Greeks were probably the first to define cancer as a specific disease and to distinguish between benign and malignant tumours.

But Manchester professors said it was unclear if this signalled a real rise in the disease, or just a greater medical knowledge.

The 17th century provides the first descriptions of operations for breast and other cancers.

And the first reports in scientific literature of distinctive tumours only occurred in the past 200 years or so, including scrotal cancer in chimney sweeps in 1775 and nasal cancer in snuff users in 1761.

Professor David, who presented the findings to Professor Mike Richards, the UK's cancer tsar and other oncologists at a conference earlier this year, said: 'In industrialised societies, cancer is second only to cardiovascular disease as a cause of death. But in ancient times, it was extremely rare.

'There is nothing in the natural environment that can cause cancer. So it has to be a man-made disease, down to pollution and changes to our diet and lifestyle.

'The important thing about our study is that it gives a historical perspective to this disease. We can make very clear statements on the cancer rates in societies because we have a full overview. We have looked at millennia, not one hundred years, and have masses of data.

'Yet again extensive ancient Egyptian data, along with other data from across the millennia, has given modern society a clear message – cancer is man-made and something that we can and should address.

Dr Rachel Thompson, of World Cancer Research Fund, said: 'This research makes for very interesting reading.

'About one in three people in the UK will get cancer so it is fairly commonplace in the modern world.

Scientists now say a healthy diet, regular physical activity and maintaining a healthy weight can prevent about a third of the most common cancers so perhaps our ancestors’ lifestyle reduced their risk from cancer.'
Original source.

Friday, October 8, 2010

There's much controversy on the Jewish view of when life begins. In Jewish tradition, the fetus is not considered viable until after it graduates from medical school.
- - - - - - -
When the doctor called Mrs. Friedman to tell her that her check came back, she replied, "So did my arthritis."

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

The Poisoned Needle

A recent, new vaccine, Gardasil, against the papillomavirus, the supposed culprit in vaginal and cervical cancer, our benevolent FDA approved for females from 9 to 26 years old. Given to males between 9 and 26 it's supposed to prevent genital warts.

(By eating healthy foods and avoiding promiscuity, people would be much better off.)

As of today it's already tied to 16 or more deaths. Report here.

UPDATE (1/20/11) HPV Vaccines with False Advertising. Here.

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Monday, September 27, 2010

Fighting the Medical Mafia - A 1951 Letter

I took the trouble to type up this Letter to Collier's Weekly by Dr. Royal Lee, in defense of Dr. Frederick Koch, written back in 1951, (image here) so you can sense what was going on already then, just as it is going on today, with the wrong people at the helm of our medical system. Were it not for good and brave people such as Dr. Lee, there'd be little hope for mankind.

Notice his disdain for Morris Fishbein - a man who destroyed many great careers (e.g., Royal Rife, Harry Hoxsey, Max Gerson).
Lee Foundation for Nutritional Research
May 21, 1951

Collier's Weekly
640 Fifth Avenue
New York 19, New York


We are wondering what influence is responsible for the article on cancer quacks you published this week.

It has all the earmarks of criminal libel because you state only such facts as serve to distort the picture and smear the people involved. Here are a few things you omitted to say:

1. Dr. Frederick Koch successfully defended himself against a Federal Trade Commission complaint after six months of testimony by doctors and their patients who had used his product. The FTC dismissed the complaint, completely exonerating Dr. Koch thereby if my understanding of FTC Procedures is correct. This is about as much of a victory for Dr. Koch as if was acquitted in Soviet Russia of making disparaging remarks about Stalin, for the FTC by law needs no preponderance of evidence to convict anybody. They only need SOME evidence. My opinion is that the testimony of Dr. Koch's witnesses was so dramatically convincing that the FTC decided to dismiss the case as the only way to keep the recorded transcript from becoming public property. In such an eventuality the record is impounded and cannot be published. (The secret proceedings of out totalitarian despots in Washington). (When the leading toxicologists of this country were quoted in a similar FTC case to the effect that aluminum salts were poisonous and for the same reason that lead salts are poisonous, that they can use nerve cell degeneration, particularly of the lower cranial nerves, spinal cord and brain medulla, can cause constipation, loss of weight, anesthesia of the mouth, lessened sensation all over the body, fatty degeneration of the kidney and liver, albuminuria, paralysis of the central nervous system, -- (Docket 540 FTC) a similar dismissal occurred, and the public to this day cannot get access to this damning evidence of the dangers of aluminum contamination of foods. rather, the FTC goes out of its way to issue orders to lecturers on hygiene to desist from making any comment on the possible toxicity of aluminum. So de we have free speech? Do the public deserve to hear BOTH sides of controversial questions of life and death? Or do they NOT? Certainly not, when a disinterested party can be fined ten thousand ollars for telling the truth. If Collier's wants to get a REAL story of quacks in Government pay, quacks who are obviously protecting somebody's business interests at the expense of human life and health, why not write up this story? We have bulging files of incontrovertible evidence, evidence that has been suppressed by our U.S. Gestapo for years.)

2. When a man has been acquitted by a jury and in addition the FTC has dismissed a similar case after a six-months hearing of evidence, what kind of reporting is it to still claim him guilty without making an honest effort to report both sides of the case? Does it not convict YOU of the SAME kind of quackery you are proposing to condemn? It does unless I have lost my mind. It is exactly the kind of railroading of prejudged victims that cause the poor devils in Russia to lose their minds.

3. Do you know that Dr. William J. Hale, director of organic research of Dow Chemical Company, an internationally known authority on organic Chemistry, endorses Dr. Koch and his treatment? You might refresh your minds by reading what Dr. Hale says of Dr. Koch's Glyoxylide in his book "Farmers Victorious" page 158-162. (Coward-McCann, 1949).

4. You make much of the fact that many persons still died of cancer after receiving Dr. Koch's treatment. Is it fair to do this without making some effort to find out what the percentage of recoveries are among the total treated, instead of inferring that there are NO recoveries? Qualified physicians who are experienced in the use of the Koch treatment tell me that if they can control the iet of the patient and see that he gets proper care they get remission of all symptoms in 75% of the cases of cancer. They blame their failures on previous exposure of the patient to such real quackery as X-ray burning, ill-advised surgery, and failure to get the patient off carcinogenic foods soon enough. Why not make more the the incontrovertible fact that cancer only exists among races who eat white flour, refined sugar, synthetic glucose and all the candy, soft drinks and ices that carry these concoctions? Certainly, advertising these facts is tough on many advertisers in your journal. But, the use of these counterfeit foods is tough not only on the human race but is also tough on a lot of good friends of mine.

5. Was it a deliberate smear attempt to say that most of Dr. Koch's doctor customers were not blessed with medical degrees? Certainly, it is also fair to tell that the animosity against Dr. Kock is so great in the political circles that manage Organize Medicine that any physician who uses the Koch treatment has his malpractice insurance revoked, despite the fact that glyoxylide is supposed to be as harmless as distilled water?

If these doctors are licensed to practice, to use such treatments as this, why infer that there is anything irregular about it? It is common to sneer at other than medical doctors as followers of "cults". The worst cult in my mind is the poison cult, the use of poisons where foods, enzymes, hormones or trace minerals are the physiological remedy required. The next most heinous cultists is the razor-happy follower of the surgical cult, who has a trick remedy for every disorder and whose victims leave behind them a trail of spare parts until they are unable to proceed further. Just as an example, read this month's "Reader's Digest" (May 1951) page 20 - tonsil removal is now officially considered a barbarous practice, as bad as chopping out ovaries or blood-letting.

You probably are not aware that the same squeeze is put on every cancer specialist who tells his patients that they had better change their eating habits if they desire to avoid a recurrence after an operation for the removal of the malignant growth. I can list several internationally known cancer surgeons who were professionally destroyed for this heinous offense, according to all the evidence available. One of Canada's leading heart specialists is right now being given this treatment for daring to use the wheat vitamin (E) to cure patients dying of heart disease. This despite the unquestioned fact that half of a group of cattle dropped dead within 3 years after being put on a diet as devoid of that vitamin as commercial cereal products, bread, and etc. Despite the fact that some forms of that vitamin relieve angina pectoris pains in a few minutes. Despite the fact that any cardiographic recording shows phenomenal benefits in a few minutes after ingesting the wheat germ vitamins. Despite the fact that the phony synthetic vitamins used to "enrich" bread have the opposite effet when checked by a cardiograph, (or by observing the survival period of test animals on such "food").

6. Did you know that Dr. Morris Fishbein in 1925 proposed and apparently consummated a deal with the organized baking and milling industry to propagandize the doctors and general public against the growing impression that white bread was unfit for food, putting himself in the saddle as the mouthpiece and chief hangman of the racket? If you want a photostatic copy of this blood-curdling document as engrossed by Fishbein's stooge, Dr. Cramp, just ask me for it.

7. Did you know that this stinker, Fishbein, though supposedly "sent to the sticks", is still in a position to carry on his function of keeping an iron curtain around the medical profession, barring all knowledge he might feel is bad for his partners in crime, the job being editor-in-chief of the INDEX MEDICUS, so that if an article happens to get by the editorial screen of the hundreds of medical journals, he can, if he desires, to index it or fail to index it, to keep it dark? I can also give you a list of cheap, but effective remedies that can be gotten in every drug store at a few cents an ounce that he fails deliberately to recognize at any time. (Possibly because it might hurt the sale of five dollar shots of wonder drugs and vitamins of synthetic source? -- One is hydrochloric acid therapy, a penny is all it costs to give an injection of this remedy and there are reams of references where it has been shown to do what Cortisone is now being sold for -- but if you want a list of them you must go to the index of medical literature prepared for the Army and Navy by the Surgeon General's office at Washington -- evidently they do not trust Fishbein).

8. At this point why not renew your study of the definition of QUACK? Do you not feel proud of your own gullibility? You might also read your article in that same issue of Collier's about Karl Gruber who put the welfare of his people above political expediency -- Where are YOUR guts and conscience?

9. Why did you attack Philip Drosnes And Lillian Lazenby without any attempt to get the facts? Do you NOT know that of the hundreds of patients treated FREE (during the time that DRosnes and Lazenby operated that clinic not one cent was accepted for the medication)? EVERYONE was require to bring a certified report proving that they were victims of incurable cancer. (This was done to forestall the common dodge of official quacks to claim that when there is a remission of symptoms the patient had been improperly diagnosed and never could have had cancer).

10. Did you know that the expense of this free clinic was borne by a Catholic congregation who raised the cash every month to pay the rent and other expenses of the Clinic, while Drosnes and Mrs. Lazenby donated their time and supported themselves on their own resources meanwhile?

11. Since their product was made by inoculating whole wheat flour with a specially made culture of fungus, from which the extract was isolated, if any contamination of insect fragments existed, it must have been in the wheat. They had no desire to be secretive about their product. They freely gave samples of the crude culture of fungus in the wheat meal, as well as of the finished extract. You an find just as disgusting stuff in most whole wheat products if you want to look for it, just as ordinary "pasteurized" milk is rotten with thirty million or so bacteria of highly assorted pedigrees. (Per cubic centimeter). (If the farmer took the trouble to properly wash the muck off the cow before applying the milking machine it will drop to 200 per cc. That is what I found out at a country school recently, where the pupils milked cows themselves, knowing that the milk was to be put on their own table.) Your report was one of a number made by organizations affiliated with Fishbein's racket, after samples had been requested from the Drosnes-Lazenby Clinic. At that time these people felt that the requests were honest efforts to find the truth.

Furthermore, these smear artists of organized medical racketry and their partners in crime in the Federal Food and Drug Gestapo never seem to hesitate about misrepresenting the facts to railroad their victims. They will swear in trying to justify a criminal charge for which there is no actual basis, that a vitamin deficiency is incapable of causing disease, incapable of causing a perceptible symptom of disorder, by saying that it "cannot cause a functional disturbance."

They will use a transcript of testimony in an appealed case that was so altered by juggling words that the appeal judges can be made to believe that the original witness said the opposite of what he really did, and thereby deprive their victim of a fair judicial review.

They will visit the patients of a doctor who uses products they are gunning for and viciously slander the doctor by calling him a quack for using the product in question, all before any court has had the opportunity to pass on the merits of the dispute.

They will make seizures in as many places as possible for foods or drugs they do not like in the deliberate effort to destroy the business of a defendant without offering him an opportunity to be heard in court. All these crooked and vicious practices are in the main brought to bear against special food products designed TO SAVE THE LIVES OF PATIENTS WHO HAVE BEEN VICTIMIZED BY INADVERTENT USE OF BLEACHED FLOUR, REFINED SUGAR, SYNTHETIC GLUCOSE, IMITATION BUTTER AND OTHER COUNTERFEIT FOODS SOLD UNDER FALSE PRETENSES THAT THEY CAN SUPPORT LIFE. Just WHO is behind this horrible conspiracy? WHY DOES COLLIER'S FREELY OFFER THE PROPAGANDA POWER OF ITS PAGES TO FURTHER THIS MURDEROUS PROGRAM?

Is COLLIER'S being inadvertently USED in this campaign? Or does Collier's WANT IT THAT WAY?

Very truly yours,

Royal Lee, President
You can find the amazing story of the Drosnes & Lazenby Clinic here, on page 71.

Sunday, September 26, 2010

Making Money on Cancer

Regarding the rising incidence of cancer, see what Dr. James C. Thomson wrote - back in the early 1900's:
The glaring and carefully ignored fact that is constantly bypassed is the cancer rate is increasing for all ages, but especially among young people. As many readers will know, quite tiny infants today are dying of cancer in their cradles.

Personally I would place the responsibility on the shoulders of the drug houses and their agents, the drug doctors, along with the food manipulating firms. So far as I can judge, these are the two major groups responsible for this most disturbing new development.

A large factor of uncertainty arises because the most fantastic profits are made by the industries which live upon disease and war. The great chemical cartels are involved in both, and their influence spreads far afield. They spend millions annually on "educating" the public into an acceptance of war and disease as inexorable.

Recently Ralph Wightman received a great ovation when he suggested that to make money out of war should be illegal. I would go further; I would include disease. But such laws are impossible. Represenatives of the cunning men who draw enormous incomes from these evils, congest the Universities, Medical Schools and Parliaments of the "civilized" world.
Has anything changed since then?

* * * * Many Symptoms, One Disease * * * *

After more than 50 years experience, Dr. J. H. Tilden wrote:
"After years of floundering in the great sea of medical and surgical speculation to find the causes of so-called "diseases", all I could find was that all of the people were sick part of the time, a part of the people were sick all of the time, but, glory be, all of the people were not sick all of the time. Some people got well under my treatment and friends would say that I cured them; Others died and friends would say that Providence removed them. I knew that I did not cure those who got well, and I did not like to acknowledge, even to myself, that I had killed those that died ….

"It took a long time to evolve out of the conventional idea of
many diseases into the truth that there is but one disease, and that the 400 catalogued so-called diseases are but different manifestations of toxemia - blood and tissue uncleanliness.
Dr. John H. Tilden, the son of a physician, was born in Van Burenburg, Illinois, on January 21, 1851. He received his medical education at the Eclectic Medical Institute, Cincinnati, Ohio, a medical school founded in 1830 as a protest against the allopathic and homeopathic schools of medicine of that time. He was graduated in 1872, with the degree of doctor of medicine. From the best information we can obtain, his father was a Dr. Joseph G. Tilden, who came from Vermont in 1837 to Kentucky, where he married.

Dr. John H. Tilden started the practice of medicine at Nokomis, Illinois, then for a year at St. Louis, Missouri, and then at Litchfield, Illinois, until 1890, when he moved to Denver, Colorado. In Denver he located in the downtown business section, in an office with other doctors. Later he established a sanitarium in an outer section of the city. This sanitarium and school he conducted until 1924, when he sold the Institution, for about half of what he had plowed back into its development, to a Dr. Arthur Voss of Cincinnati, Ohio, intending to devote himself to writing and lecturing. However, he soon became discontented without his school and after a period he bought two residences on Pennsylvania Avenue, in Denver, united them into one and opened a new sanitarium and school, having to borrow from a friend a part of the money with which to make the purchases. This probably was in 1926. This school continued until the Doctor's death, on September 1, 1940.

It was during the early years of his practice in Illinois, that Dr. Tilden began to question the use of medicine to cure illness. His extensive reading, especially of medical studies from European medical schools, and his own thinking, led him to the conclusion that there should be some way to live so as not to build disease, and in this period his thoughts on toxemia began to formulate and materially develop. From the beginning of his practice in Denver, the Doctor used no medicine but practiced his theory of clearing the body of toxic poison and then allowing nature to make the cure, teaching his patients how to live so as not to create a toxic condition and to retain a healthy body free of disease. An uncompromising realist and a strict disciplinarian, the Doctor wasted no time on those who would not relinquish degenerating habits, but to his patients and disciples he was both friend and mentor.

In 1900 he began the publication of a monthly magazine called "The Stuffed Club," which continued until 1915, when he changed the name to "The Philosophy of Health," and in 1926 the name was changed to "Health Review and Critique." His writing for his publication was almost entirely done in the early morning hours, from three until seven. The purpose of the publication was not to make money but to spread knowledge of the Doctor's teachings. In time it attained a wide circulation, not only in this country but also abroad, even in Australia, but it never produced revenue, for the Doctor refused to make it an advertising medium, as often urged to do by advertising firms. As his death revealed, after sixty-eight years of practice, the Doctor had accumulated only an exceedingly modest estate. His life was pre-eminently one of self-sacrifice and of devotion to service, searching after truth, with an indomitable will and with an intense fortitude to adhere to the truth when discovered. In his day the Doctor's thoughts received no support from the established medical profession but brought the strongest of opposition and condemnation.

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Dr. Tullio Simoncini's Postoperative Methodology
for Cancer Lumpectomy

Special thanks to Frances Oman for telling her story and filming it. If only more were as smart, brave and forthright. Smart, for checking out other therapeutic avenues; Brave, for bucking the trend of those less fortunate and ignorant, or hypnotized into trusting allopathic ("conventional") medicine; And forthright, for telling us and filming it - to show us too.

She used Gerson therapy, first of all, to change her dietary routines. To help her get well even faster, she took the recommendation of the Gerson people and submitted to a resection of the tumor - done in Rome, by Dr. Tullio Simoncini, who uses Sodium Bicarbonate to sterilize the post-surgical wound and to kill any leftover cancer cells that might otherwise again take root. (This cheap product would never cut the grade in America because it's not patentable. This common solution is a whole lot different than the poisonous chemotherapy used in America.) After the surgery she remained on the Gerson diet.

The Gerson therapy is not focused on in this film; Dr. Simoncini's method gets most of the attention.

The doctor may well be mocked by many of his allopathic counterparts, but for the rest of us he is a champion of good. The well-being of his patient he holds more sacred than allegiance to money or a false creed.
Source: Here.

Artificial Heart Transplant

From a nine-hour surgical foray into medical history in 1967, fast-forward to 2010, when another leap has been made, this time in Israel with the implant of an artificial, titanium-alloy heart in the chest of a 74-year-old member of a kibbutz, the Hebrew term for a collective community.

Due to his age, “Ronen” (pseudonym) was not a candidate for a “live” heart transplant, the operation pioneered by famed South African heart surgeon Dr. Christiaan Barnard, who died in 2001. Instead, he has become the oldest person in Israel to receive an artificial heart, and the oldest in the world to receive the 140-gram HeartWare device, in an operation that took only five hours to complete on his birthday.
Entire article here.

Thursday, September 16, 2010

You Can CURE Degenerative Disease
- (I repeat) You CAN!

If only people, who succumb to these illnesses, don't fall for the rush to conventional therapy, as these conventionalists urge, and simply try these simple nutritive therapies, they'd save themselves a lot of agony, and a lot of money, and will be able to get back their good health.

Here's another good video clip that says the same thing:

Healing Cancer by Diet

There's so much disinformation out there on cancer, and on other degenerative diseases, that I like to post stuff that dispels some of that untruth. It's been so pervasive for so long. It's only thanks to the internet that now simple folk like myself can try and fight the mafia, each of us in our little way, to try and bring sanity and real care into medicinal therapeutics.

Two roads diverged in a wood, and I --
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.

Robert Frost

Cancer Cure Rates

Statistics of this disease are hard to come by, but if you listen or watch the advertising, you'd think cures were easy to come by. Here's a chart of some statistics, such as we'd like to see more of, for they immediately tell the real story. The one below looks quite appropriate for the results one can expect if they're unfortunate enough to undergo "CONVENTIONAL" medical "treatment". They hardly ever use the words therapy or cure. Do you know that the only permissible treatments for cancer in America is burn, poison or cut; Said in euphemistic speak, that's radiotherapy, chemotherapy or surgery. Pretty grim, no?Their advertising (drug-pushers that they are) often sounds something like this:
"Hey, you know someone with Alzheimers? Now they can try a new experimental drug. They won't even have to pay a dime. They'll even have their travel expenses paid for. Sign up now. Qualified people are waiting to interview them. (That means any dope willing to make their older kin a guinea pig for the drug company will gladly be taken advantage of). And it's at this beautiful ivory-paneled hospital (to add luster and so-alled respectfulness, the better to hide this disgusting proposal)".

Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Medical Establishment in the Pockets of the Pharmaceuticals

Is Academic Medicine for Sale?
An editorial from the New England Journal of Medicine from 2000,
even more relevant today.

This woman is part of the system and therefore her conclusions are not nearly forceful enough. Those doctors in the employ of pharmaceuticals who have published (in this journal and all other "respectable" ones) are not mentioned by name, to disqualify their "findings". And since 2000 they continue to publish their slanted research. What's worse, their colleaugues continue to be recruited in greater numbers by the drug industry.

In 1984 the Journal became the first of the major medical journals to require authors of original research articles to disclose any financial ties with companies that make products discussed in papers submitted to us. (1) We were aware that such ties were becoming fairly common, and we thought it reasonable to disclose them to readers. Although we came to this issue early, no one could have foreseen at the time just how ubiquitous and manifold such financial associations would become. The article by Keller et al. (2) in this issue of the Journal provides a striking example. The authors' ties with companies that make antidepressant drugs were so extensive that it would have used too much space to disclose them fully in the Journal. We decided merely to summarize them and to provide the details on our Web site.

Finding an editorialist to write about the article presented another problem. Our conflict-of-interest policy for editorialists, established in 1990, (3) is stricter than that for authors of original research papers. Since editorialists do not provide data, but instead selectively review the literature and offer their judgments, we require that they have no important financial ties to companies that make products related to the issues they discuss. We do not believe disclosure is enough to deal with the problem of possible bias. This policy is analogous to the requirement that judges recuse themselves from hearing cases if they have financial ties to a litigant. Just as a judge's disclosure would not be sufficiently reassuring to the other side in a court case, so we believe that a policy of caveat emptor is not enough for readers who depend on the opinion of editorialists.

But as we spoke with research psychiatrists about writing an editorial on the treatment of depression, we found very few who did not have financial ties to drug companies that make antidepressants.

(Read rest here).

Thursday, August 26, 2010

Good Riddance to Small Medical Practices

Look at this; Obamacare wants to do away with small doctor practices. Why? This they won't tell you, but it's the same reason they want to eliminate small farmers, like organic farmers. By having only big medical establishments, the competition to their METHODS of TREATMENT will go unchallenged. That way they can be sure to dumb down the masses as they, and only they, see fit. E.g., mandatory vaccinations, mandatory "conventional" treatments, mandatory insurance coverage, etc.

An article of alternative medical care of cancer, as, say, Dr. Max Gerson's method, could never get coverage in "respectable" medical journals, but support for Obamacare - does. An article from the Annals of Internal Medicine just came out begging doctors to jump on board this evil scheme. Here's a report about it.

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

The Swine Flu - Remember the Fuss?

You remember all the fuss made about the "Swine Flu" (later changed to "Someother Flu" name, not to impinge upon Muslim sensibilities)? Well - nothing happened of it - did it? It was all a lot of hot air - with the intention to PUSH VACCINATIONS. As if a healthy body could not fight off a flu virus. As if a little more mercury and whatever else contained in the vaccine cannot hurt. When all it really was was another way to make some quick money for Big Pharma.

Monday, August 16, 2010

Do You Have Silver Fillings?

Have any "silver" fillings in your mouth? Then beware, or at least be aware, amalgam contains some 50% mercury. This mercury always emits a vapor, particularly when rubbed, or hot liquid touches it. See here what dentists were never taught; Which is why most of them, also, think the substance is harmless. How would they otherwise know? By reading? Yes, if their busy practice gives them the time. But how many of them, in this time, take time to read on research in their own field? Would they not rather be reading some "leisurely" rather than doing "extra credit" reading about their own trade? Thank goodness for the few that do take the time and do want to buck the system - guys like Dr. Hal Huggins.

Anyhow - this video clip is a must-see for all who want to know - and see - the truth for themselves.

Friday, August 13, 2010

Our Trusty FDA - Another Stab in Our Back

They put Fluoride poison in our waters. That's because we're too stupid to buy Fluoride pills were we to deem that substance necessary for our health. They call ozone a poisonous gas to make sure doctors don't use it for therapy, even though it is a superlative agent that fights infection. Doctors are proscribed from using what pits of apricots contain, vitamin B17 (Laetrile), to fight cancer. The list they label as deleterious is a long. All of them, of course, are unpatentable and therefore cannot bring money into the pharmaceutial coffers. But fluoride poison placed into the public's drinking water, why that's okay. Amalgam, with is heavy component of mercury, has been a dental mainstay for years. And of course, fluoride in the toothpaste is standard.

There are many ways they want to dumb down society to perpetuate illness, and to keep up the demand for medical "treatment" - But now, here comes a new one, and this one too is a biggy.

The link is here.

In plain English, it boils down to this:
It will be Illegal to GROW, SHARE, TRADE, SELL Homegrown FOOD...

In other words,

They want total control to dumb us down, and to control agricultural output.
Kiss goodbye to the small farmer.
Why, you, small farmer, gave the people the food they wanted, and used natural fertilizer instead of chemical fertilizer, and you did not spray your fields with pesticides, both of which rob our pharmaceutical companies from "treating" diseased patients, and hurt the income of

Sunday, July 18, 2010

Psychiatry Drug Pushers

Here you have a nice psychiatric scandal that belies the sort of ethics the psychiatric establishment encourages. (LINK)

The whole history of psychiatry started like this. There were a bunch of homeless people around in those poor times and, Charcot was it, the "father" of Freud, had these people hauled off the streets to some institution and, by labeling them sick, or mental, they could thus kill two birds with one stone; "Treat them" as sick, and clean the streets from them too.

I think most psychiatrists should be on the drugs they're pushing. They're the real criminals, keeping their poor victims forever hooked on these zombie-inducing pharmaceuticals.

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

The Futility of Chemotherapy
An Article by Charlotte Gerson, from her
Healing Newsletter Sept. 2006

What was true then is even more so today. Here's the article:
No Beneficial Effect

We have reported a number of times in the Gerson Healing Newsletter on studies that severely question or even deny any usefulness of chemotherapy treatments. The German newsmagazine Der Spiegel (equivalent to the U.S. Time magazine) published one of the more powerful ones in December 1990. In that monograph, German biostatistician Dr. Ulrich Abel summarized his findings in these words: "There is no evidence for the vast majority of cancers that treatment with these drugs (cytotoxins) exerts any positive influence on survival or quality of life in patients with advanced disease." Abel continued, "The personal views of many oncologists seem to be in striking contrast to communications intended for the public."

In April 2004, Der Spiegel published another report by several serious researchers regarding results obtained from treatments with chemotherapy. Epidemiologist Dieter Hoelzel of the Clinic Grosshadern at the University of Munich states "Regarding survival rates in patients with metastasizing carcinoma in the intestinal tract, the breast, the lungs or the prostate, we have not made any progress in the past 25 years." He, together with a group of oncologists, created a database containing the medical histories of several thousand cancer patients leading to this conclusion.

The latest figures from the University of Munich's cancer registry do not reflect any prolongation of life spans. "While the outlook has improved slightly for patients suffering from intestinal cancer, breast cancer survival rates have decreased over the years. Gynecologist Gerhard Schaller, at the University of Bochum, says, "Chemotherapy has done practically nothing for women with late-stage breast cancer - there is literally much ado about nothing." This opinion is confirmed by Wolfram Jaeger, director of the Gynecological Department of the Staedtische Clinic Duesseldorf, "There have been and there are no success stories. We treat large numbers of women without tangible proof of success."

In September of 1985, then-Director of the Gynecology Department at the University Hospital of Hamburg-Eppendorf, declared at an international congress in Berlin: "It should set us thinking to hear a growing number of doctors say: 'I wouldn't allow that kind of treatment on myself.'"

The progress of chemotherapy is seen in the relief of suffering caused by the drugs themselves. These cell toxins used to weaken the patients to the point that they had to be monitored in hospital. Now there are remedies for hair loss, vomiting, loss of appetite, diarrhea and constipation. Many chemo drugs may be administered on an out-patient basis and, explains Dr. Overkamp, an oncologist in Recklinghausen, "The patients hardly suffer any more from bouts of vomiting. That way I was finally able to install wall-to-wall carpeting in my office."

Thursday, June 10, 2010

Two Big-Pharma Whistleblowers

You think medicine and pharmaceutical companies have your best interests in mind, right?

Well here's an x-pharma guy who saw it as it is. See this 7 min. video. (It was a talk given in Israel, apparently, and I suppose the guy with the micrphone next to our hero was translating every few sentences.)

Here's another good 7-min. video.

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Cancer is a Huge Industry

As long as the Drug/Medical industrial complex keep pushing the big surgery, radiation and chemotherapy; And as long as the Food/Agricultural industrial complex destroys the nutrition of the soil, food and water, disease will be around to keep their hospitals filled for "treatment".
Consider this...

Each diagnosis of cancer is (on average) worth somewhere between $300,000 and $500,000 to the medical industry. More than half of this money goes to the drug companies. Due to lobbying and other incentives, it’s no secret that both the FDA and the AMA are heavily influenced by drug companies.
What if we’re not crazy? What if nutrition could not only prevent cancer, but cure it as well? What would the FDA, politicians, drug companies, unhealthy food companies, and the American Cancer Society stand to gain? What do they stand to lose?

[Found at]

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Wikipedia Founder
- What He Thinks of His Own Creation

For those of you who still don't realize medical education and practice in this country has its roots in evil, and don't yet know the FDA, AMA, ADA, NIH, NCI, etc. are all in cahoots with the medical-pharmaceutical mafiosos, here's an example:

Read what the founder of Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales, thinks of his own creation, and how data regarding Drs. Gerson, Rath, Cathcart, etc., as an example, have been manipulated and maligned. This example is but a tip of a huge iceberg.

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Femur fractures on Fosamax

"Women throughout the United States have reported suffering spontaneous and unexplained femur fractures on Fosamax.", was today's headline somewhere in the U.S.!

What will the AMA and their ilk say in response? "Don't worry, don't jump to conclusions; No need to dump the Fosamax; Just speak to your doctor."

Doctor - huh? Keep taking the poison, right? Don't worry about your bones breaking?

This story, like most others about pharmaceutical junkmeds, really is a headline screaming: "This drug is poison; Taking it makes your bones suffer (but maybe not to the extent that it'll necessarily break your bones!"

Don't people yet understand that taking these pseudomeds are further poisoning them, instead of helping them? That these pharmaceutical pushers are not really just worthless doctors, but stupid killers; Stupid - if they don't know any better, and killers if they do.