Pathology - and its relation to Breast Cancer, for example

Someone, on her blog, posted an article on Breast Cancer and some things that can be taken for it, such as vitamin D or something. This is how I commented on the article:

The way you word your post, reflects, if I may feel free to say, a wrong perspective on the targeted disease. You see, by thinking that cancer of the X needs therapy X, and cancer of the Y needs therapy Y, etc., means that you see ALL the cancers as DISTINCT entities, each with their OWN, UNIQUE ETIOLOGY. This is a mistake. ALL cancers are really ONE problem - and that is that the body has been accumulating toxins for so long that , finally, the "weakest link in the chain", finally snaps. No body is like another, and so the most vulnerable organ or tissue can vary, given the onslaught of toxicity.

By viewing each cancer as its own unique illness - you are playing into the hands of Organized, "Conventional", "Standard Practice", "NON-QUACK" medicine. Because this is exactly what they want you to believe, and have programmed people AND DOCTORS (from medical school on) to believe.

And, by the way, that's why the "TREATMENTS" used by conventional medicine just don't work. For example, one of the jobs a pathologist must do is determine whether or not the surgical specimen he was handed, e.g., a surgically removed breast, has been cleanly removed, in its entirety. That is, he must ascertain that all the EDGES of the tissue removed show NO CANCER CELLS at these peripheries.

That is, the supposition is - that if the removed breast tissue shows no cancerous cells at the edges of its borders, then the ENTIRE cancer mass can be presumed to have been removed, without any residual cells left over in non-resected tissue to spawn any new cancerous growth.

Well, you tell me. Do you really believe this theory of resection of the entire mass, with NO residual cancerous cells left over in the "good", remaining tissue - is a successful strategy? Have you not heard of the millions and millions that continue to get cancer again, and again, DESPITE MASSIVE RESECTIONS and MUTILATIONS of womens' bodies? You tell me - is their theory worth anything?

NO and NO! You know why? Because cancer is a generalized disease of the body that derived from incorrect food intake, for the most part.

So, do they continue to do mastectomies? Of course. It's big money. Surgery is one of the standard 3 "conventional", and federally approved (by those on the take) means to "TREAT" cancer. The other two worthless methods are burning by radiation and poisoning by chemotherapy.

People have to start understanding this if we are going to change our medical system once and for all.

Another Good Alternative to "Conventional" Cancer "Treatment"

"Cheap, Safe Drug Kills Most Cancers" - Now I ask you, if this title, that represents fact, were to be publicized for DCA (dichloroacetate), what chance do you think the good doctor behind this wonderful research (Dr. Evangelos Michelakis) will have to bring his life's work to fruition, given Big-Pharma's huge potential financial loss as a result? I'm sure they have their big guns standing ready to blast this Canadian and his research out of the water.

Conventional medicine's "treatments" for cancer, hypertension, arthritis, multiple sclerosis, adult-onset diabetes - in fact, all chronic degenerative diseases - are just that, "treatments". They never have a CURE for these! Nor would they allow it! When's the last time you heard someone had high blood pressure, arthritis or Alzheimer's reversed? Healing these diseases would mean dealing with the them in ways other than PUSHING PILLS for the life of the patient. Today's doctors (many, unwittingly) are mostly drug pushers for the big-pharma interests. The whole system, its schools, its governmental agencies, the hospitals, insurance companies, the charities, the positions available, licensing, as well as companies involved in pesticides, flouride disposal, genetic engineering of seeds, dental amalgam with mercury, vaccines with mercury ... - all of this is tightly controlled by higher echelon interests who care nothing at all for people's illnesses, but care only to dumb down people and bleed them dry of their money. Did you know - nutrition is never taught in medical school? When's the last time you went to a doctor who asked you, "What did you eat"? (Did you know the Jewish Code of Law states that the number one cause of most illnesses is - what you put into your mouth! [chpt 32]) Did you know - there'a a law on the books that pesticides cannot be removed from the market, even if found to be cancer-causing, unless the EPA pays the manufacturers for all the stuff they still hold in inventory, which is twice as much as the EPA's budget? This corruption is so pervasive, yet people, many highly intelligent, simply won't believe it. They don't yet get that 95% of what the supermarket sells is toxic, even basic products like vegetables and eggs, with pesticides, herbicides and hormones; That their water and toothpastes have fluoride, which is a poison. (If fluoride were so good for us, then let us take fluoride supplements - as WE feel we'd want to - not as they force us to.) People are still naive, thinking it's a benevolent establishment. Little do they know the good stuff is discouraged, suppressed and outlawed.

Anti-Neoplastins; Another Cancer Cure - that Threatens the Medical Mafia

Watch both movie TRAILERS on this page regarding Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski, to get a vivid idea, how, yet again, the racketeering American Medical Industry, together with their heavy-handed federal conspirators, tried to suppress and ban this good doctor's efforts to help mankind.

UPDATE: Great movie of him here.

Another Remarkable Way to Heal Cancer - Suppressed

Dr. Samir Chachoua, an Australian doctor, came up with a fabulous way to fight cancer. But because his way would diminish the flood of money made by pharmaceuticals and hospitals, guess what happened. Here's the good man's story:

As Usual - Corruption in Medicinal Policy

Judges Invested in Health Care

by Brendan L. Smith

Three U.S. District judges presiding over legal challenges to the landmark federal health care law have held financial investments in the health care industry, which has a lot riding on the outcome of the cases, according to a Center for Public Integrity review of their latest available financial disclosure forms. The investments include individual stocks and mutual funds with holdings in private health insurance companies, companies selling health-care products, or pharmaceutical firms, according to the forms the judges filed in 2009 and 2010.

Judicial ethics experts disagree about the significance of the judges’ investments.

As the lawsuits crawl through the judicial system, the first ruling against the health-care reform law came Dec. 13 by U.S. District Judge Henry Hudson of the Eastern District of Virginia, who ruled that the individual mandate requiring people to buy some form of insurance invited an “unbridled exercise of the federal police powers.”

The Huffington Post reported in 2010 that Hudson in 2008 earned between $5,000 and $15,000 in dividends from Campaign Solutions, a political communications firm that did work for health care reform opponents, including Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli. Hudson earned the same amount in 2009, according to his most recent financial disclosure form.

Read the rest here.