Sunday, November 28, 2010

A Case of Leukemia - Cured

Here's an interesting case of leukemia cured. What I like most about the case is that it confirms, for the umpteenth time, that "conventional" therapy DOES NOT WORK, although they keep trying it decades after decades, while better methodologies exist and abound. (Only a change to a good diet will usually work. )
Amazing first: leukemia patient completely cured with cord blood stem cells
BERLIN - Doctors associated with the German umbilical cord blood bank Vita 34 say that they have cured a child’s leukemia completely using an infusion of stem cells from umbilical cord blood.

The procedure was reportedly performed in 2005 on a four-year-old girl whose chemotherapy treatment had failed and who had a prognosis of only three months to live. The procedure was possible because the parents had decided to preserve their child’s umbilical cord blood at the time of birth.

After continuous monitoring of the child for five years now, with no sign of leukemia cells in her blood, doctors say that they have confirmed that the treatment worked.

“Seventy-five months have passed and we can speak of a cure with certainty,” said Eberhard Lampeter of Vita 34.

According to the Chilean newspaper La Tercera, this is the first case in the world of a child cured of leukemia by her own stem cells. In most cases the child’s umbilical cord blood is not available, and the stem cells of close family members must be used.

The new treatment is the latest in a long string of hundreds of successes in the science of stem cell treatments that use mature cells rather than embryonic stem cells. Embryonic stem cell treatments, which destroy a human life, have never been proven effective in any medical treatment to date. Treatments with mature stem cells do not cause harm to the donor of the cells.

Stem cell pioneer Dr. Colin McGuckin recently told LifeSiteNews that, despite amazing success with umbilical cord blood treatments, it remains difficult to obtain funding for research because of the “cult of celebrity” in science, which rewards controversial research over research that is truly effective in saving lives.

“People aren’t talking about cord blood because it’s not controversial,” McGuckin told LSN. “Consequently, it does not make headlines and therefore researchers who want to use the cells from cord blood do not receive funding.”

Energy-Saving Bulbs - Be Very Careful ...

According to data from the web, so-called "Energy-Saving" bulbs, or low energy bulbs, if broken, can cause serious danger! If broken in a person'e presence, the person should leave the room for at least 15 minutes. The gas liberated from this item on breakage is mercury vapor, which is a very strong poison that should not be inhaled. Some Ministry in England warns NOT to clean up the debris with a vacuum cleaner, because it would spread the contamination to other rooms in the house when using the vacuum cleaner again. Don't forget the gas doesn't stay with physical dirt but can easily dissipate into the air. Rather, the broken glass and debris should be swept with a broom or brush, sealed and thrown right away from the house into a bin for hazardous materials. Mercury is dangerous, more poisonous than lead or arsenic!

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

The Medical Mafia in Distortional, Destructive Mode



You've heard of Dr. Max Gerson, have you not? He devised, first a cure for tuberculosis, until then an "incurable" disease, and later a cure for cancer. (The person who identified the tuberculosis bacterium got the Nobel Prize; The one who found its cure - did not.) He cured Albert Schweitzer, M.D., this man's wife and daughter, of ailments and received public accolades from this Nobel Laureate. He presented before Congress and spoke of his many cured "incurable" cancer patients on broadcast radio. He wrote a book of 50 such "incurable" patients, who were sent home to die by "conventional" doctors, this after they raided and ransacked his property and stole his previously recorded manuscript of this book.

Had you heard of Dr. Matthias Rath? He co-authored a number of papers with Linus Pauling, a Nobel Laureate in medicine, about the effects of Vitamin C on cancer. Heard about Dr. Robert F. Cathcart III, the orthopedic surgeon who invented the replacement hip-ball joint still in use today? He too was strobg advocate of heavy Vitamin C use in disease.

Now check out what the Medical Mafia has done to the Wiki documentation that originally existed on the internet, before this rotten group of controllers stuck their greedy fingers into the information base - to hide this stuff FROM YOU! (Because reading this information could only empower you and they would stand to lose multi billions of dollars that come out of YOUR POCKET for the "conventional treatments", because this information reveals the efficacy of therapies that CANNOT BE PATENTED!
The Hidden Wikipedia:
How to Find Deleted Material about Nutritional Medicine
-------------------------------
(OMNS, May 11, 2010) There is nothing quite like a paper trail, and Wikipedia has one. Consequently, you can read for yourself all the material that has been added, and then deleted.

For example: Wikipedia’s page about
Max Gerson, M.D., is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Gerson . The doctor is widely known for the nutritional cancer therapy that bears his name. Gerson’s principal biographer is his grandson, Howard Straus http://www.doctoryourself.com/gersonbio.htm . Mr. Straus tells the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service of some interesting experiences he has had with Wikipedia bias:

“Some years ago, on seeing that the pages for Dr. Max Gerson and the Gerson Therapy were only stubs (short place-holders with little information on them), I took it upon myself to flesh out the pages. I thought Wikipedia was fairly neutral on balance, so I put in all the information that I could, and kept it factual with references, citations, and literature links.

“Within a month, the following had happened:

“The information was labeled as “biased” and “unreliable” because I am Dr. Gerson’s grandson and biographer. There appeared a big red flag at the top of the article labeling the articles neutrality “dubious.” The photograph I posted was removed. Provable, referenced facts, with dates and places, all suddenly became “claims,” even quotes from no less than Nobel Laureate Albert Schweitzer, M.D., who famously said: “I see in Dr. Max Gerson one of the most eminent geniuses in medical history.” Dr. Schweitzer and his wife were patients of Dr. Gerson, making this a first-hand account from a rather reliable source.

“All my links, references and citations were removed. They were replaced by links to the American Cancer Society and National Cancer Institute, which offer only criticism of the Gerson Therapy. Even quotations from published scientific papers were removed. Attempts to rectify these actions were immediately overwritten.

“It’s easy enough to show the progression of the pages, since Wikipedia displays former edits on request, dated and documented. One can verify this by clicking on the “History” tab at the top of the Max Gerson page, and looking at 2005 and before. My editing is archived at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/69.109.140.164 and also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Howard_Straus

“A second Wikipedia page, specific to the Gerson Therapy, has been completely removed. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gerson_therapy&redirect=no . To see something of what happened, you can click the “History” tab here as well.”

The OMNS adds just one other intriguing statement about Dr. Gerson’s work that is probably too “unreliable” to be seen on Wikipedia:

“I know of one patient who turned to Gerson Therapy having been told she was suffering from terminal cancer and would not survive another course of chemotherapy. Happily, seven years later, she is alive and well. So it is vital that, rather than dismissing such experiences, we should further investigate the beneficial nature of these treatments.” (H.R.H. Charles, Prince of Wales)

Max Gerson is not the only nutritionally-oriented physician whose work is slanted or censored at Wikipedia. Others include Matthias Rath, M.D., and Robert F. Cathcart III, M.D.

Matthias Rath, M.D.
Dr. Rath coauthored a number of papers with Linus Pauling. (1- They discussed high-dose vitamin therapy for cardiovascular disease. To see what is going on at Wikipedia concerning him: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Matthias_Rath
Paul Anthony Taylor, a supporter of Dr. Rath, comments: “Instead of providing free access to the sum of all human knowledge, as is its supposed aim, Wikipedia would appear to be just another way of supporting the scientific, political and social status quo. In a sense, however, the game is already up for Wikipedia.

The official exams watchdog in the UK, Ofqual, recently stated that schoolchildren should avoid it as it is not “authoritative or accurate” and in some cases “may be completely untrue” http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/6943325/Schoolchildren-told-to-avoid-Wikipedia.html Believe it or not, one of Wikipedia’s contributors is the CIA, and they are not just updating their own entries, either. http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/08/16/2007049.htm When it comes to nutritional therapies, you won’t currently find much of it on Wikipedia.”

Robert F. Cathcart, M.D.
The Wikipedia page for this physician has been deleted. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Robert_Cathcart
Why? Because Dr. Cathcart “does not meet notability criteria per WP:BIO http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BIO ” and “a quick google search shows up no reliable hits for this subject.”

Indeed? It appears that someone was not looking. Orthopedic surgeon Robert F. Cathcart III is the inventor of the Cathcart Elliptical Orthocentric Endoprosthesis, a replacement hip-ball joint still in widespread use today after 37 years. http://www.orthomed.com/pros.pdf Some physicians report it to be superior to other similar devices. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2661497 That alone qualifies him as notable, and invalidates the deletion of his page at Wikipedia. In addition, Linus Pauling personally singled out Dr. Cathcart for recognition for his nutritional knowledge as early as 1978. (9)
You can read the rest here.

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

A Brief Documentary of "Conventional" vs "Alternative" Therapy

A historic documentary of how the mafia-like medical establishment gained its death-grip; Of how hundreds of promising cancer cures are crushed and suppressed - rigging each case to guarantee its failure.

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

C A N C E R -- Is Curable!

Here's an article by a doctor who courageously tells the truth about this dreaded disease - dreaded only because the medical mafia establishment prevents any good research be done to alleviate this disease, because that would eliminate the tremendous profit to be had in cutting, burning and poisoning - the standard protocol that for over half a century has made them trillions. Yet there exist so many natural, alternative medical approaches, each able to tackle this disease better than the "conventional" one. Here is another example of one such new avenue that promises to deliver a much better prognosis, at a much cheaper cost, without destructive side effects. By the way, Dr. Simoncini, of whom this article talks about, has appeared on this site before, as has its author, Dr. Rowen.

Quickest, Easiest, Cheapest Cancer Treatment Ever Bicarbonate

by Dr. Robert Rowen

This May Be the Quickest, Easiest, Cheapest, and Most Effective Cancer Treatment Ever!

I’ve treated many cases of cancer going against the standard slash, burn, and cut mantra of the medical establishment.

And I’ve seen some great success. But no injection therapy I’ve ever used took my breath away for its ease of use and effectiveness. That is until I saw the treatment I’m going to tell you about this month!

In fact, this remedy is so inexpensive that you probably have some sitting in your refrigerator right now. You’ve probably baked with it. The raw material costs mere pennies. It’s exceedingly safe. Its beauty lies in its simplicity. And it may be the greatest discovery for cancer treatment, EVER.

This astounding cancer treatment is nothing more than sodium bicarbonate. You know it as baking soda. And I am excited to be the first to bring you news of this stunning breakthrough.

I know it sounds unbelievable. I’m sure you’re sitting there saying, Baking soda cures cancer? Dr. Rowen’s lost his mind.

Well, give me a chance to turn you into a believer.

Dr. Tullio Simoncini is an Italian physician who was the first to discover bicarbonate’s ability to cure cancer. I recently met Dr. Simoncini at a seminar in Florida. I was so impressed that when I heard he was coming back to teach in Dallas, I had to see him again.

However, before you can understand Dr. Simoncini’s work, you need a little background. Dr. Simoncini’s work is based on the groundbreaking work of several pioneers in alternative medicine. Back in the 1930s, for instance, Weston Price, DDS traveled the world studying health and nutrition in various people groups.

Dr. Price studied dwindling aboriginal cultures as they still existed at the time. He detailed their amazing health and why they were far healthier than people in our own culture. Price found tribes where reaching 100 was commonplace.

Men were still tending their fields and chasing women decades younger. Physical degeneration was rare. There were few if any dental cavities or decay. Dental arches were nearly perfect, no need for orthodonture.

People were healthy right up until the time of their death. Then they would fall asleep and simply not wake up. What a great way to go. Our big killers, cancer and heart disease were largely unknown.

The common link among all the indigenous people was their diet.

The various peoples were not eating the same foods. They couldn’t, separated by vast differences in climates, altitudes, etc. Some had lots of meat, some had almost none. But there was a commonality.

The soils of their fields were rich in minerals, often from glacial silt runoff. The plants likewise were loaded with minerals. The peoples ate what grew around them, when in season, organic and fresh.

Price returned to some of these cultures years later. Indeed the physical health had deteriorated in many. Children had rotting teeth, their arches became malformed with crowding teeth.

The formerly robust physical bodies of adults were now riddled with the same degenerative diseases we experience. Price observed the clear reason they were now eating processed foods from the West.

What happened to our food that so destroyed our bodies? In the 1930s and 40s government actions paved the way for big business agriculture. In the 40s the government started analyzing our crops and soils for minerals.

In the ensuing 70 years or so, as Agribusiness took over, the mineral content of our soil has plummeted over 80%. This plunge is reflected in known mineral content of our foods, both organic and non-organic. Our produce is woefully lacking in the minerals once rich in our diet and necessary for health.

Let me give you an example of how this shift in our soil’s mineral content significantly affects our health. Back in the 1940s, a medical pioneer, Max Gerson, MD was curing cancer.

His cure? Diet, and diet alone. He used fresh living foods and juices, organic and fresh. His cure rate was about 30-35%, light years better than any conventional method of today.

Strangely, those of us following him have not been able to reproduce his success. That confused many of my colleagues into wondering about Gerson altogether. Well, there’s a simple explanation. It all revolves around acid-base and minerals.

Minerals in solution are positively charged. In fact, all minerals in our cells are positively charged. But what happens when we don’t have enough minerals?

Dr. John Apsley, executive director of the Immunogenic Research Foundation, Inc., has the answer. His answer also explains why Gerson’s therapy doesn’t work nearly as well anymore.

Dr. Apsley said, We are living in different nutritional times. We now are so depleted in cations (positively charged minerals) that our cells, desperate to stay alive, will grab onto anything positively charged.

With no or few minerals, the only thing they can resort to is positively charged hydrogen ions (which are nothing more than acid ions) or positively charged chemical toxins.

Gerson Therapy worked because his patients were not nearly as far-gone nutritionally as we are. A fruit and vegetable-rich diet was able to replace needed cation minerals successfully in a third of his patients.

Apsley said that a light went on in his brain when learning of Dr. Simoncini’s successes. He said that injecting bicarbonate into the cancer site does something that diet alone can’t do.

The bicarbonate literally sucks out the acid hydrogen ions, from the deepest regions of your cells. This allows nutritional minerals to replace the semi-toxic acid. This recharges your cellular defenses.

The patients of Gerson’s day ate foods that were far richer in minerals in those years. Gerson’s juicing program gave the cancer patients high concentrations of the most absorbable form of minerals fresh juice. Minerals were in their natural plant-made colloid state, as prepared for us by God. Gerson’s patients were not nearly so mineral depleted as we are now.

They also were not as acid. So, he could cure many cancer patients with diet alone.

Baking soda is alkaline. It is also negatively charged. So it helps reduce your acid state. But it does a lot more than that.

Dr. Simoncini discovered research showing that all solid cancers have something in common. They are all held together by a fungus. This fungus produces an acid-based glue that holds it and the cancer cells together.

This fungus is none other than Candida, the common fungus in many yeast infections. Dr. Simoncini found out that Candida plays a vital role in cancer’s ability to survive. Here’s why.

All normal cells are programmed to self-destruct after a period of time, or if they are damaged. That process is called apoptosis. Normal apoptosis is the main way your body wards off cancer.

But, Candida makes toxins that directly impair the apoptosis process. If your cell doesn’t self-destruct when it goes awry, it can further degenerate into endless division. At that point, it becomes cancerous.

Dr. Simoncini maintains that Candida becomes intertwined with tumors, protecting its immortality. To destroy the tumor, we have to knock out this fungus. So you might think that antifungal drugs might do it. They don’t. No one has ever cured cancer with an antifungal drug.

But baking soda does!

We’ve known for years that sodium bicarbonate kills all sorts of fungi and microorganisms. It works so well, in fact, that there are patents in Europe and the U.S. for its use against these invaders. (You can check this out for yourself by searching for patent number 6432425 at the website www.uspto.gov or patent number EP1233374 at the website www.freepatentsonline.com.)

So how does Dr. Simoncini knock out cancer with sodium bicarbonate? He administers 500 cc of a 5% bicarbonate solution intravenously over about one hour, many doctors add potassium to their IV solution.

And he does so six days out of seven. He may also inject it at the site of a local tumor for accessible cancers (like breast). With a cooperating invasive radiologist, he may have a catheter inserted directly into the artery feeding the cancer. He’ll then pump in the bicarbonate directly.

Remember, bicarbonate is alkaline and negatively charged. It neutralizes the positively charged acid glue that holds Candida together. With the bicarbonate, the fungus just falls apart. Without the fungus to maintain it, the cancers immediately self-destruct.

Now Dr. Simoncini admits there is a weakness. You need a good blood supply to bring ample bicarbonate to the tumor. Soft tissue primary cancers and metastases usually have enough blood supply. However, metastases to bone may not.

Many of Dr. Simoncini’s supportive colleagues have modified his protocol to include alternating weeks of bicarbonate with high dose intravenous vitamin C (100 grams in 1,000 cc D5W) over five hours.

They do this daily, except one day off per week. The two weeks (one of bicarbonate and one of vitamin C) completes one cycle. It will often take only three more cycles to get rid of almost all soft tissue cancers!

I will admit that, at first blush, this seemed too simplistic. This is a disease that has a trillion-dollar industry built around it. Five-and-dime baking soda? Vitamin C? I thought, No way!

But look at how effective the Simoncini protocol is. The overwhelming majority of primary and non-osseous (non-bone) metastatic cancers disappear within days to weeks. Days? Yes indeed.

When it comes to breast cancer, your doctor can flood local tumors with bicarbonate. Local injection can be very painful to be sure. But wouldn’t you rather take some pain and spare your breast from getting chopped off by a surgeon?

Dr. Simoncini’s breast protocol calls for surrounding a breast tumor with up to 120 cc of 5% sodium bicarbonate solution daily if tolerated. After several sessions, most of these local cancers are totally gone!

Distant cancers require intravenous bicarbonate. Even better is direct infusion into the artery feeding the tumor. In Italy, Dr. Simoncini has the luxury of open-minded interventional radiologists.

Many of them are willing to place catheters into the target arteries for direct bicarbonate infusion into the tumor. This is not possible in our current medical system. So far, none of the bicarbonate trainees have been able to find a caring radiologist who’ll place the patient above dogma.

But some doctors are willing to place the catheters for IV vitamin C. That means there’s hope that you can get this done.

This happened to Sarah Jones. She and her husband, Bob Jones, sponsored Simoncini’s visits to the U.S. She was dying of metastatic breast cancer. She had failed all therapies. With intravenous bicarbonate, she cleared all her soft tissue metastases.

Only bone cancers were left. She started vitamin C drips. The bone metastases did regress. She came off morphine in four days. But she had received radiation 6 months previously.

It led to terminal complications and she did succumb. Bob tells me that he is following at least 40 other patients of which only 4 have not done well (arresting the cancer or better).

Folks, this is a miraculous story! I will update you regularly with the latest information on the five and dime treatment of cancer. No, it doesn’t really cost a nickel. We have to use extremely pure pharmaceutical preparations unlike what’s in your refrigerator.

But the basic stuff is the same: simple baking soda! Injection preps aren’t cheap either. But when compared to Big Pharma’s bazillion buck poisonous treatments, the treatment is very inexpensive.

I am again thrilled to get you this potentially lifesaving information. It’s so simple that any qualified provider who is trained in IV techniques can administer it in your own home. It’s ease of use and low cost will make this treatment a major target of federal bureaucratic agencies.

If and when you see any negative information about bicarbonate therapy, please be sure to note who is pushing it. A bicarbonate cure for cancer could upend one of the richest, most evil and gruesome industries in the world: the cancer establishment.

For more information on Dr. Simoncini’s incredible work, read his book Cancer Is a Fungus. It’s available at www.cancerfungus.com. And for more information on Dr. Price’s timeless work, visit the Price Pottenger Foundation’s website at www.ppnf.org.
Original article here.